Comments for /dev/stu http://www.stuartaxon.com Adding LOC to the web. Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:52:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 Comment on Netcat in windows by stu http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-251 stu Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:47:46 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-251 Here are some more details http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:wIIgDd8B6xQJ:packetstormsecurity.org/papers/virus/Taking_Back_Netcat.pdf+netcat+marked+by+virus+checker&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=uk&client=firefox-a Here are some more details

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:wIIgDd8B6xQJ:packetstormsecurity.org/papers/virus/Taking_Back_Netcat.pdf+netcat+marked+by+virus+checker&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by stu http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-250 stu Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:45:49 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-250 @tpierron: If you read the description here http://research.sunbelt-software.com/threatdisplay.aspx?name=RemoteAdmin.Win32.NetCat&threatid=47713 it appears that netcat itself is flagged in the enterprise versions as it's not something that "normal" users would be running on a business network. They probably flag other networking tools too. @tpierron: If you read the description here http://research.sunbelt-software.com/threatdisplay.aspx?name=RemoteAdmin.Win32.NetCat&threatid=47713 it appears that netcat itself is flagged in the enterprise versions as it’s not something that “normal” users would be running on a business network. They probably flag other networking tools too.

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by tpierron http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-249 tpierron Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:18:14 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-249 Hey guys, it is me or all the archives you linked contain a virus-infected executable in it ? Kapersky, Norton and AVG all complain that it is infected by RemoteAdmin.Win32.NetCat I recompiled the source with MinGW and no more complain ... Maybe a false positive, since I didn't see any port in the listening state opened while running the command, but still I wonder if you can have a similar warning if you compile the source with VC. Hey guys, it is me or all the archives you linked contain a virus-infected executable in it ? Kapersky, Norton and AVG all complain that it is infected by RemoteAdmin.Win32.NetCat

I recompiled the source with MinGW and no more complain …

Maybe a false positive, since I didn’t see any port in the listening state opened while running the command, but still I wonder if you can have a similar warning if you compile the source with VC.

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by stu http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-248 stu Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:53:07 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-248 @Madman: I just tried redownloading the first link and it seems to work ok. @Madman: I just tried redownloading the first link and it seems to work ok.

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by Valamer Kutayami http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-246 Valamer Kutayami Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:51:27 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-246 Thank you very much, I had a very hard time tracking down this little tool a week or so ago, I did end up finding it but then someone deleted it on me and I couldn't remember where I got it from last time. Your just saved me a lot of time searching all over again :) Thank you very much, I had a very hard time tracking down this little tool a week or so ago, I did end up finding it but then someone deleted it on me and I couldn’t remember where I got it from last time.
Your just saved me a lot of time searching all over again :)

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by Madman http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-241 Madman Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:11:10 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-241 Too bad these links no longer work. Only downloads 65,536 bytes and ZIP complains of missing signature and cannot open it. Too bad these links no longer work. Only downloads 65,536 bytes and ZIP complains of missing signature and cannot open it.

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by Abel Cheung http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-210 Abel Cheung Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:47:40 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-210 But the real origin of netcat win32 port, http://www.vulnwatch.org/netcat/, is indeed down for (at least) days. It even disappeared completely from google cache. So your copy may be more valuable now :) But the real origin of netcat win32 port, http://www.vulnwatch.org/netcat/, is indeed down for (at least) days. It even disappeared completely from google cache. So your copy may be more valuable now :)

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by Shane http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-207 Shane Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:03:33 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-207 It won't go down. :p It won’t go down. :p

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by Jon Craton http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-205 Jon Craton Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:04:33 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-205 I had a hard time finding this file myself. Thanks for the link. I found this blog via Google. :) I have mirrored the file on my site in case that link goes down in the future. http://joncraton.org/files/nc111nt.zip I had a hard time finding this file myself. Thanks for the link. I found this blog via Google. :)

I have mirrored the file on my site in case that link goes down in the future.

http://joncraton.org/files/nc111nt.zip

]]> Comment on Netcat in windows by Dave http://www.stuartaxon.com/2008/05/22/netcat-in-windows/#comment-203 Dave Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:55:04 +0000 http://www.stuartaxon.com/?p=51#comment-203 Thanks mate, saved me a whole lot of looking, I was just starting to despair :-) Thanks mate, saved me a whole lot of looking, I was just starting to despair :-)

]]>